<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/node/110323/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Intel blogger blasts Gartner&#039;s WiMAX analysis, suggests LTE bias</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An experienced blogger like Intel&#039;s Gregory Ofili should know that sometimes it&#039;s a good idea to take a step back and count to ten before hitting &amp;quot;publish.&amp;quot; But sometimes that doesn&#039;t happen -- and thats a risk for unfiltered corporate blogging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;blogged&lt;/a&gt; about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071808-wimax.html&quot;&gt;recently released report&lt;/a&gt; by Gartner which said businesses shouldn&#039;t invest in WiMAX yet. Ofili, who is marketing manager for Intel&#039;s WiMAX Program Office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;responded very &lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;passionately&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to the report, claiming it was &amp;quot;thoroughly devoid of reality,&amp;quot; a &amp;quot;drive-by kneecapping&amp;quot; and suggesting that the analysis &amp;quot;should be supplied with a warning: &#039;not intended to inform strategic business decisions.&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What got Ofili so riled up? In the report, Gartner suggested customers should wait at least until Wimax technology is deployed more widely across the US and dual-mode cellular/WiMAX handsets are available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds logical enough, right? Not to Intel, which took issue with Gartner&#039;s claim that WiMAX will remain a &amp;quot;niche technology&amp;quot; and won&#039;t be able to provide nationwide coverage for years. But there&#039;s more: Ofili suggests Gartner is biased toward a rival wireless technology, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/lte-trials-begin-us-end-june-2009&quot;&gt;LTE&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;quot;The LTE gang must really fear WiMAX. Otherwise, why all the attention and erroneous analyses?&amp;quot; he says. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geez Greg, its one thing to disagree with someone, but maybe they hit a nerve? Take a deep breath next time -- you won&#039;t come off so defensive -- or worried that they might be right. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-ye%20ar-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2008/06/25/it-vs-initiative-internet-a%20ge-comes-battlefield&quot;&gt;IT vs. initiative: The Internet age comes to the battlefield&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/24/what-your-future-really%20-looks-digital-home-2013&quot;&gt;The Digital Home of 2013: 10 consumer technologies that will succeed, and five that will fail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4078">co:gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/3600">co:Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:47:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110323 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Intel blogger blasts Gartner&#039;s WiMAX analysis, suggests LTE bias</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An experienced blogger like Intel&#039;s Gregory Ofili should know that sometimes it&#039;s a good idea to take a step back and count to ten before hitting &amp;quot;publish.&amp;quot; But sometimes that doesn&#039;t happen -- and thats a risk for unfiltered corporate blogging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;blogged&lt;/a&gt; about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071808-wimax.html&quot;&gt;recently released report&lt;/a&gt; by Gartner which said businesses shouldn&#039;t invest in WiMAX yet. Ofili, who is marketing manager for Intel&#039;s WiMAX Program Office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;responded very &lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;passionately&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to the report, claiming it was &amp;quot;thoroughly devoid of reality,&amp;quot; a &amp;quot;drive-by kneecapping&amp;quot; and suggesting that the analysis &amp;quot;should be supplied with a warning: &#039;not intended to inform strategic business decisions.&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What got Ofili so riled up? In the report, Gartner suggested customers should wait at least until Wimax technology is deployed more widely across the US and dual-mode cellular/WiMAX handsets are available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds logical enough, right? Not to Intel, which took issue with Gartner&#039;s claim that WiMAX will remain a &amp;quot;niche technology&amp;quot; and won&#039;t be able to provide nationwide coverage for years. But there&#039;s more: Ofili suggests Gartner is biased toward a rival wireless technology, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/lte-trials-begin-us-end-june-2009&quot;&gt;LTE&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;quot;The LTE gang must really fear WiMAX. Otherwise, why all the attention and erroneous analyses?&amp;quot; he says. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geez Greg, its one thing to disagree with someone, but maybe they hit a nerve? Take a deep breath next time -- you won&#039;t come off so defensive -- or worried that they might be right. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-ye%20ar-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2008/06/25/it-vs-initiative-internet-a%20ge-comes-battlefield&quot;&gt;IT vs. initiative: The Internet age comes to the battlefield&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/24/what-your-future-really%20-looks-digital-home-2013&quot;&gt;The Digital Home of 2013: 10 consumer technologies that will succeed, and five that will fail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4078">co:gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/3600">co:Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:47:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110323 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Intel blogger blasts Gartner&#039;s WiMAX analysis, suggests LTE bias</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An experienced blogger like Intel&#039;s Gregory Ofili should know that sometimes it&#039;s a good idea to take a step back and count to ten before hitting &amp;quot;publish.&amp;quot; But sometimes that doesn&#039;t happen -- and thats a risk for unfiltered corporate blogging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;blogged&lt;/a&gt; about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071808-wimax.html&quot;&gt;recently released report&lt;/a&gt; by Gartner which said businesses shouldn&#039;t invest in WiMAX yet. Ofili, who is marketing manager for Intel&#039;s WiMAX Program Office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;responded very &lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;passionately&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to the report, claiming it was &amp;quot;thoroughly devoid of reality,&amp;quot; a &amp;quot;drive-by kneecapping&amp;quot; and suggesting that the analysis &amp;quot;should be supplied with a warning: &#039;not intended to inform strategic business decisions.&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What got Ofili so riled up? In the report, Gartner suggested customers should wait at least until Wimax technology is deployed more widely across the US and dual-mode cellular/WiMAX handsets are available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds logical enough, right? Not to Intel, which took issue with Gartner&#039;s claim that WiMAX will remain a &amp;quot;niche technology&amp;quot; and won&#039;t be able to provide nationwide coverage for years. But there&#039;s more: Ofili suggests Gartner is biased toward a rival wireless technology, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/lte-trials-begin-us-end-june-2009&quot;&gt;LTE&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;quot;The LTE gang must really fear WiMAX. Otherwise, why all the attention and erroneous analyses?&amp;quot; he says. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geez Greg, its one thing to disagree with someone, but maybe they hit a nerve? Take a deep breath next time -- you won&#039;t come off so defensive -- or worried that they might be right. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-ye%20ar-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2008/06/25/it-vs-initiative-internet-a%20ge-comes-battlefield&quot;&gt;IT vs. initiative: The Internet age comes to the battlefield&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/24/what-your-future-really%20-looks-digital-home-2013&quot;&gt;The Digital Home of 2013: 10 consumer technologies that will succeed, and five that will fail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4078">co:gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/3600">co:Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:47:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110323 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Intel blogger blasts Gartner&#039;s WiMAX analysis, suggests LTE bias</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An experienced blogger like Intel&#039;s Gregory Ofili should know that sometimes it&#039;s a good idea to take a step back and count to ten before hitting &amp;quot;publish.&amp;quot; But sometimes that doesn&#039;t happen -- and thats a risk for unfiltered corporate blogging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;blogged&lt;/a&gt; about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071808-wimax.html&quot;&gt;recently released report&lt;/a&gt; by Gartner which said businesses shouldn&#039;t invest in WiMAX yet. Ofili, who is marketing manager for Intel&#039;s WiMAX Program Office, &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;responded very &lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;passionately&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to the report, claiming it was &amp;quot;thoroughly devoid of reality,&amp;quot; a &amp;quot;drive-by kneecapping&amp;quot; and suggesting that the analysis &amp;quot;should be supplied with a warning: &#039;not intended to inform strategic business decisions.&#039;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What got Ofili so riled up? In the report, Gartner suggested customers should wait at least until Wimax technology is deployed more widely across the US and dual-mode cellular/WiMAX handsets are available.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sounds logical enough, right? Not to Intel, which took issue with Gartner&#039;s claim that WiMAX will remain a &amp;quot;niche technology&amp;quot; and won&#039;t be able to provide nationwide coverage for years. But there&#039;s more: Ofili suggests Gartner is biased toward a rival wireless technology, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/lte-trials-begin-us-end-june-2009&quot;&gt;LTE&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;quot;The LTE gang must really fear WiMAX. Otherwise, why all the attention and erroneous analyses?&amp;quot; he says. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geez Greg, its one thing to disagree with someone, but maybe they hit a nerve? Take a deep breath next time -- you won&#039;t come off so defensive -- or worried that they might be right. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-ye%20ar-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2008/06/25/it-vs-initiative-internet-a%20ge-comes-battlefield&quot;&gt;IT vs. initiative: The Internet age comes to the battlefield&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/24/what-your-future-really%20-looks-digital-home-2013&quot;&gt;The Digital Home of 2013: 10 consumer technologies that will succeed, and five that will fail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4078">co:gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/3600">co:Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:47:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110323 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
