<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Yahoo to accept Microsoft acquisition - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Yahoo to accept Microsoft acquisition&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo will at a minimum</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-346</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yahoo will at a minimum reject this offer to get MSFT to increase the bid&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:04:55 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steven forsythe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 346 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s quiet likely that MSFT</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-288</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;It&#039;s quiet likely that MSFT has got something up their sleeve; acquisition of Yahoo will give them an opportunity to implement. Google is right to be worried about this. After all, becoming a second Netscape is not a pretty picture.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:05:49 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lev Danilov</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 288 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s too cheap.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-343</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;It&#039;s too cheap.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:16:21 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jack Powers</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 343 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google &amp; Yahoo have worked</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-339</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Google &amp;amp; Yahoo have worked together previously &amp;amp; this is the reason why Microsoft is bidding for Yahoo. However I don&#039;t think Google is going to take it easy, as Microsoft-Yahoo together would be&lt;br /&gt;
very good competition for Google.&lt;br /&gt;
This will result in MS raise the bidding amount per share. &amp;amp; surely Yahoo won&#039;t be accepting the offer by the said date.&lt;br /&gt;
You know where I&#039;ve put my money on ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:06:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Denish Patel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 339 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I believe MSFT will have to</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-321</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I believe MSFT will have to raise its offer to at least $37 per share.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:04:32 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ben Silverman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 321 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-310</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I think Google should be more than prepared for this event. I&#039;d expect such a wise team to have a well thought out strategic contingency plan. You can&#039;t win this with PR, legal talk nor with last minute attempts to create strategic alliances. Microsoft is proving to be a wise old owl.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:16:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elisabeth Jane Bertrand Elisabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 310 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>well working Prediciton</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-309</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;well working Prediciton market, Good job guys&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:27:09 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>calle nilsson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 309 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oligopoly (corrected,</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-269</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Oligopoly (corrected, where&#039;s the spell check Standard!?!) exists so no acquisition necessary at this time. More likely is MSN to buy ASK or AOL or another second or third tier search engine. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe this tender is a move by MSN to draw Google out of the weeds since there is talk of a partnership between the two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My question is who are the four firm&#039;s in the search Oligopoly or is there one at work at all here?&lt;br /&gt;
Oligopoly&lt;br /&gt;
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia&lt;br /&gt;
Oligopoly is a common market form. As a quantitative description of oligopoly, the four-firm concentration ratio is often utilized. This measure expresses the market share of the four largest firms in an industry as a percentage. Using this measure, an oligopoly is defined as a market in which the four-firm concentration ratio is above 40%.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew 9</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 269 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is a &quot;Hostile&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-287</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;This is a &quot;Hostile&quot; take-over attempt by Google.  Yahoo will likely reject Mr. Softy&#039;s offer.  However, shareholders of Yahoo! may be much more likely to comply.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, while I voted against Yahoo saying &quot;I Do,&quot; I do think a forced wedding in in the cards.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But this story is still quite fresh.  Google will do their best to make a counter offer or play the regulatory damsel in distress.  It is too soon to make a good judgment on where this will go, but Microsoft has the bucks and Yahoo is a company in trouble.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Too bad that a MS/Yahoo merger probably won&#039;t give Yahoo what it needs most . . . a sense of direction.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And that&#039;s the way I see it,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dusty Sage&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:52:55 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Todd Regan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 287 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More than likely Yahoo will</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-280</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;More than likely Yahoo will accept the offer, but then will probably get nixed by the US DOJ because of the past dealings with Microsoft.  It may well happen after the election to nix this deal but right now or even if this happened a year earlier the DOJ would have probably blessed this deal.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Yates</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wouldnt bet my life on it</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-277</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Wouldnt bet my life on it but overall to me it makes good sense. Jerry Yang-Gates.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:42:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sam Feuer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 277 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>1) Oligopolies exist and are</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comment-276</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;1) Oligopolies exist and are a great way to do business.  2) Microsoft has learned that its Midas touch is intermittent at best; having been burned in this space previously, they will seek to buy a quality player.  3) Google and Microsoft hate each other for a reason.  If Microsoft is going to hit Google hard, they need Yahoo!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:31:18 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alexander Hughes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 276 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo to accept Microsoft acquisition</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;background-color: #dddddd; font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;This prediction had an aggresive closing date of Feb 6, 2008.  The bid was not officially accpeted by Yahoo by that time.  The prediction was closed by the market, and the community consensus that the prediction would not occur was correct.  A new predicition with a closing date for mid-March &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition-mid-march&quot;&gt;has been posted&lt;/a&gt;.  --The Industry Standard&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;According to the New York Times, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/01/technology/01cnd-subyahoo.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; title=&quot;MS bid for Yahoo&quot;&gt;Microsoft offered an unsolicited bid&lt;/a&gt; to acquire Yahoo for $44.6 bilion.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that Yahoo will accept the healthy acquistion bid by MS.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If Yahoo accepts, the internet consumer business as it is known today will be no more.  The overall control of eyeballs (Yahoo serves approximately 500 million pages a month) combined with Microsoft&#039;s MSN/Live suite customers on top of their ad networks could be enormous.   &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This rumor has been floating around for over a year.  The bid has finally taken place.  Betting in favor of this prediction implies you believe Yahoo will accept. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/898">acquisitions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/790">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1034">Yahoo</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 07:18:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">99086 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
