<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Ad spending will shift from impression to performance-based marketing in 2008 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Ad spending will shift from impression to performance-based marketing in 2008&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>@TIS, can this judged</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-8208</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@TIS, can this judged already? Performance-based marketing has shifted to 52% compared to impression-based marketing which is at 44% for 2 consecutive years. References for judgment had been set via Judge Early post.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:01:31 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8208 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>As it turns out, the change</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-8081</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;As it turns out, the change started in 2007 and continues in 2008. The latest numbers from 2008 confirms that the 2007 decisions is not a fluke occurrence but is now indeed the trend (aka &quot;the shift&quot;). Applicable IAB reports had been submitted to TIS for judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:42:03 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8081 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Absent of measurable</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-3802</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Absent of measurable criteria and the obvious challenge TIS will have to close/judge this, I am surprised that there have been 66 bets/cashouts. Personally, I am going to stay away from this one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:51:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3802 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This was one of the first</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-3799</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;This was one of the first predictions created.  It was written before TIS bothered with such things as measurable criteria. :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t envy TIS staff figuring out how to close/judge predictions like this one.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:15:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3799 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Matt, I echo Shiv comment.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-2068</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Matt, I echo Shiv comment. There is no mention within the prediction the basis to be used for judgement. Source of metric? Also, what quantifiable &quot;shift&quot; will deem a favorable judgement?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:19:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2068 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How exactly will you measure</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-2063</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;How exactly will you measure this prediction?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:49:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Shiv Bhandari</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2063 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good news for both display</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-756</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Good news for both display and performance-based online advertising in 2008 ... no one likes change ... the traditional advertising world has been rocked by online advertising growth in the last five years, most of which came at its expense ... this was during a period characterized by a robust economy when change is not always demanded ... in a weak economic cycle, change is demanded and this augurs well for both absolute and relative growth in online display and performance-based advertising ... I give the edge to performance-based over display in particularly tough times, but suggest the lines between the two will blur as &quot;optimum&quot; campaigns will increasingly incorporate both   ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sean Duggan - motiveinteractive.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 11:18:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sean Duggan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 756 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two-thirds of the</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-365</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Two-thirds of the advertising professionals believed it would take three years or less for 20% of revenue to shift from traditional impression based media to impact-based measures (online). Lehman Bros.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:29:16 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elisabeth Jane Bertrand Elisabeth</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 365 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Isn&#039;t ad spending online</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-272</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Isn&#039;t ad spending online already heavily weighted to &quot;performance based&quot;? Search and Google ad words are all pay per click which is performanced based and represents the lions share of online advertising. Google just picked up DoubleClick becase they were missing the 1/3 of ad spend in branding campaigns that is traditionally found in display ads which are usually sold on an impressions basis. I think the real question is will display (impression) advertising catch up to search (clicks) this year or not?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew 9</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 272 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There&#039;s a big difference</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comment-271</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;There&#039;s a big difference between what marketers want and what will happen.  Brand campaigns may seem inefficient, but that&#039;s mainly because there is not a directly quantifiable method of evaluating performance.  If online direct marketing worked for brand focused companies then I&#039;m sure the biggest categories spending online would be CPG and Auto as they&#039;re the companies that have the biggest ad budgets globally. However, they happen to be the two smallest categories advertising online.  Why?  Because you&#039;re going to have a hard time evaluating the performance of a Tide campaign by looking at traditional web ROI metrics.  Any company that can do direct marketing is already doing so, they started years ago and Google only accelerated their investment. I have to believe that while marketers may want to see more accountable campaigns, unless people start buying their toothpaste and running shoes online direct marketing is not something that&#039;ll make sense to them.  I think this is a prediction better suited to 2009 when video has totally taken off and perhaps we&#039;ll be able to better measure the ROI from branding in the online environment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:45:45 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Marc Ryan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 271 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ad spending will shift from impression to performance-based marketing in 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As marketing budgets tighten in 2008, advertisers will put a premium on performance.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They will demand greater accountability which media companies will respond to with a wider range of performance-based advertising programs.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Advertisers will spend less and less on inefficient brand campaigns and shift remaining budgets to direct marketing instead.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/ad-spending-will-shift-impression-performance-based-marketing-2008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/961">advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2946">marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2501">online advertising</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:18:07 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt McAlister</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">98824 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
