<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Microsoft + AOL: Let no man tear them asunder - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/23/microsoft-aol-let-no-man-tear-them-asunder</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Microsoft + AOL: Let no man tear them asunder&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft + AOL: Let no man tear them asunder</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/23/microsoft-aol-let-no-man-tear-them-asunder</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proving that you can&#039;t keep a good rumor down, news reports swirled yet again this week about a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/07/17/AOL_a_less_challenging_buy_than_Yahoo_for_Microsoft_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;possible marriage of inconvenience between the House of Redmond and the House of Dulles&lt;/a&gt;. Though my gut instincts tell me this is just another gambit in the endless Microhoo saga, it&#039;s possible MS would swallow the slimmer trimmer but still largely useless AOL and continue its shark-like pursuit of Yahoo as an alternative to the Google Juggernaut.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time Inc would be happy to divorce AOL, no matter who bites. And I cannot think of two more worthy parties to be joined in holy headlock. They deserve each other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact the World&#039;s Most Feared Software Company desperately needs to hook up with some other aging behemoth just to stay in the game -- not dominate the market, mind you, just keep from disappearing altogether -- is kind of remarkable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft is still ginormous and expanding into every space it can imagine -- mobile devices, TV set tops, your toaster, etc. But without a desktop OS monopoly to wield as a club, it has to start from scratch. It actually has to compete and win on merit. When&#039;s the last time Microsoft did that? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now some Cringesters have taken umbrage at my statement earlier this week that &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://weblog.infoworld.com/robertxcringely/archives/2008/07/memo_to_microso.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;everything Microsoft touches turns to excrement&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; One reader argues that Microsoft...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;    ...is directly responsible for the crushing majority of the past two decades&#039; innovations and developments in software architecture as well as its newer focus on the internet, entertainment, and gaming.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Admittedly, the excrement statement was a bit over the top. But I&#039;ve been thinking about this &quot;crushing majority&quot; for the last day or so, and I&#039;m drawing a blank. I can&#039;t come up with anything MSFT has done on the scale of Google or Web Services or even (gasp) Facebook in changing how we use technology. But maybe I haven&#039;t been paying attention. So I put it to the Microsoft fans in the audience: What are those crushing innovations? Where has Microsoft lead and not merely imitated?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Post your thoughts below, email me direct -- &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:cringe@infoworld.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cringe@infoworld.com&lt;/a&gt; -- or take &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dantynan.com/2008/07/18/what-is-the-most-innovative-tech-company/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this BuzzDash poll&lt;/a&gt;. Top entries will qualify for cool swag.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/news/2008/07/23/microsoft-aol-let-no-man-tear-them-asunder#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1533">Corporate Issues</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5664">Mergers &amp;amp; Acquisitions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1563">Mergers &amp;amp; acquisitions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:11:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110426 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
