<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - E3 to modify format or cancelled for 2009 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;E3 to modify format or cancelled for 2009&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>@Bradley, modified to Spring</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comment-3319</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Bradley, modified to Spring with explicit date range.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:22:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3319 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I like the changes itemized.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comment-3315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I like the changes itemized.  &quot;Back to May&quot; might be too specific.  Perhaps &quot;spring&quot; (as defined by the equinox and solstice)?  Don&#039;t know if including mid-June in that results in too small a change being necessary.  Id&#039; hate to see a change to April not count as a sufficiently large change.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:10:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3315 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Cyndy, ESA may have</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comment-3287</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Cyndy, ESA may have provided the indication but the number of developers that have shunned ESA this year may elect to forego E3 altogether in 2009. Regardless of the format change (event date, location to accommodate size of attendees, costs for developers showcase, etc), the lack of participation may force ESA to rethink their &quot;modified&quot; plan yet again. For the moment, ESA has indicated that there will be an E3 in 2009 with changes. Having a prediction criteria on &quot;will&quot; or &quot;will not&quot; makes it rather easy. I would like to add additional criteria to make the bet more interesting with likelihood of favorable or unfavorable judgement. Given that you have covered E3 (for TIS) this year, what additional criterias would you recommend?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:57:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3287 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>David, my feeling is its too</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comment-3284</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;David, my feeling is its too vague. The ESA has already pretty much confirmed that it won&#039;t be the same next year, so that part is a given. I think more specific change or just toss the change and leave it at a &quot;Will there or won&#039;t there&quot; would be better.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:32:44 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira509894</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3284 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Bradley, modified to</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comment-3275</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Bradley, modified to include explicit qualifiers and added supporting reference articles&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:12:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3275 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;qualifies the format</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comment-3271</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&quot;qualifies the format change&quot; is awfully vague.  Not sure I have a suggestion for improved language, however.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:42:30 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3271 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>E3 to modify format or cancelled for 2009</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;E3 is &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/18/did-we-just-watch-e3-gasp-its-last-breath&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not what it used to be&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u98/e3Grave.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Is E3 dead?&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;300&quot; width=&quot;250&quot; /&gt;The change in size, format and visibility has made E3 a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.g4tv.com/e32008/blog/post/687255/E3_2009_Bigger_Better.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lackluster event&lt;/a&gt;. Several companies have decided to skip the event altogether, and others have &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.gamers.com/_news/forwardShowNewsArticle.php?newsid=975&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;voiced their disappointment&lt;/a&gt; with the current format.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.videogaming247.com/2008/07/21/pachter-e3-is-headed-for-extinction/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;issued a statement&lt;/a&gt; in July echoing sentiments from EA’s John Riccitiello, Ubisoft’s Alain Corre and Acclaim’s Dave Perry in saying that E3 is, well, dead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“In our view, E3 is headed for extinction, unless the publishers and console manufacturers wake up to the fact that nobody cares about the show anymore,” said Pachter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; The prediction is for E3 to be modified heavily or cease altogether in 2009. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An official announcement that qualifies the format change or cancellation prior to end of March 2009 is needed for favorable judgement.   Qualified format changes must include at least one of the following: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1)  Change date of event back to Spring (between March 1 - June 15)&lt;br /&gt;2)  Attendance size to accommodate at least 10K attendees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lack of an official announcement by end of March 2009 will render an unfavorable judgement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/suggestions/e3-modify-format-or-cancelled-2009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4261">E3</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1773">Electronics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1869">Entertainment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1594">Games</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:26:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110109 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
