<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Microsoft acquires AOL - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Microsoft acquires AOL&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>@TIS, I sure hope judgment</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-6639</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@TIS, I sure hope judgment is made soon to free the frozen $ in this bet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:58:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6639 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The find Truth, follow Olaf</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-6204</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;The find Truth, follow Olaf  Olafsson of Time Warner on this.  Don&#039;t be surprised if GOOG leaks interest; if things get serious..  Olaf has personal history playing Matador with these 2 calculating bulls.  To his credit, a real wizard.with the lance.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I really respect his ability however, the prediction timeline is to aggressive, I&#039;m thinking the strategy will be more complex.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:39:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryan peters</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6204 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A part of AOL is not AOL. I</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;A part of AOL is not AOL. I agree with Garrick.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:32:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Shiv Bhandari</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3938 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Garrick, I like your</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3936</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Garrick, I like your suggestion for future M&amp;amp;A predictions. As for this prediction, it would materially change the understanding of this prediction and would not be fair to some who have placed bets. Even though I do not have any position on this prediction, I would much rather see acquisition in parts qualifies for favorable judgement (whether branding is retained or not).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:21:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3936 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bradley, thanks for your</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3935</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Bradley, thanks for your question. TIS should have a general policy on this topic for all our M&amp;amp;A predictions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think of the below approach:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &quot;Asset sales do not constitute an acquisition unless the firm&#039;s brand name is the asset (or one of the assets) that has been sold.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So for example, if MSFT only purchased some portion of AOL&#039;s assets - but did not purchase its brand - then the prediction would not be realized. However, if MSFT purchased only the AOL brand and nothing else, then it would be realized.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like this approach for two reasons: a) simplicity and b) companies trade assets all the time. However, asset sales are distinct from a full acquisition, which allows for a change of control in exchange in exchange for a premium over public and/or book value.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:39:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Garrick Hileman932530</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3935 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Bradley, good point. This</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3885</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Bradley, good point. This needs to be clarified or judgement will be subject to debate again. It is highly unlikely for MSFT to acquire the dial-up business nor will it attempt to acquire AOL as a whole and then sell of the dial-up (given that the restructure has now taken place). I believe the spirit of the prediction has always focused on the content/advertising assets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Suggestion to TIS would be to add clarification that can be judged favorable if only the content/advertising assets are acquired.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, I have posted an ancilliary suggestion for Earthlink to acquire the AOL dial-up business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 09:32:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3885 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clarification: What if it&#039;s</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3881</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Clarification: What if it&#039;s an acquisition of PART of AOL (say content but not dial-up)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;reference: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9543&quot; title=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9543&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9543&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:07:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3881 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes, a JV would not meet the</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3028</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yes, a JV would not meet the criteria of this prediction. Only a purchase of AOL by MSFT.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:00:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>garrick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3028 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Garrick, a joint venture</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3024</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Garrick, a joint venture will not make for a favorable judgement, correct? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newser.com/story/32616.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.newser.com/story/32616.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.newser.com/story/32616.html&lt;/a&gt; implies potential joint venture rather than acquisition.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:19:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3024 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft denies AOL</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comment-3025</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.canada.com/topics/technology/science/story.html?id=ef28eae4-45e8-4263-bb36-f81fa0250785&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft denies AOL acquisition rumor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:19:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3025 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft acquires AOL</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Judgment: &lt;/b&gt;This did not occur in the allotted timeframe. Judged at 0%.  -- The Industry Standard &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original prediction: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://kara.allthingsd.com/20080616/microsofts-next-quarry/&quot;&gt;suggested in BoomTown&#039;s recent post&lt;/a&gt; titled &amp;quot;Microsoft&#039;s Next Quarry?&amp;quot;,  following the Yahoo debacle &amp;quot;many expect a bold step from Microsoft in the space now&amp;quot;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kara Swisher writes: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;While some think Microsoft should stick more to its knitting and buy enterprise companies like SAP, Ballmer and Johnson have been adamant that online ads will be its next great business.  Microsoft has been very close to buying AOL before, once even considering spinning its Internet properties and AOL into a newco, so it does know the lay of the land there.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additional details of this potential deal &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/16/report-microsoft-talks-deal-aol&quot;&gt;were revealed today&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Microsoft, spurned in its recent efforts to buy all or part of &lt;a href=&quot;/tag/results/Yahoo%21+Inc.&quot; title=&quot;Yahoo! Inc.&quot; class=&quot;inform-link&quot;&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;, wants to explore ways to combine with AOL, according to the &lt;a href=&quot;/tag/results/The+Wall+Street+Journal&quot; title=&quot;The Wall Street Journal&quot; class=&quot;inform-link&quot;&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/a&gt;. The two companies have been discussing a possible deal for months as an alternative to Microsoft buying Yahoo, the Journal reported in its online edition Wednesday afternoon.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that Microsoft will announce its intent to acquire or merge with AOL on or before September 30, 2008.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/microsoft-acquires-aol#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1919">co:aol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/835">co:microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1563">Mergers &amp;amp; acquisitions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5664">Mergers &amp;amp; Acquisitions</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:34:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Garrick Hileman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109830 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
