<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Internet stocks tumble to yearly low - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Internet stocks tumble to yearly low&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Yep. I agree that this was</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-4107</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yep. I agree that this was prematurely (by a little over a day)  judged although the chances of the result being the other way around is next to impossible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:48:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4107 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Uhm, not that I mind having</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-4097</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Uhm, not that I mind having the cash freed back up, but wasn&#039;t this judged a day early?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s supposed to close today, but covers trading through close of market tomorrow as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:05:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4097 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yep. Looks like Internet</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-3590</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yep. Looks like Internet remained more robust than general economy.  Oh well... win some lose some.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:07:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3590 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sittting around 128.09 as of</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-3584</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sittting around 128.09 as of July 26, 2008.  Trending up, albeit slowly.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:18:49 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3584 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Was expecting more for today</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-3162</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Was expecting more for today but it does look like it will continue to trend downwards. After hours continues to be negative. Expect Monday to slide further.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:23:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3162 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Down 2.83% for the day.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-3155</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Down 2.83% for the day.  Closed at 124.38.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:40:27 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3155 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>After hours, most  ^QNET</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-3096</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;After hours, most  ^QNET components are in the red (some of which are significant losses)&lt;br /&gt;
AKAM -2.22%&lt;br /&gt;
AMZN -4.31%&lt;br /&gt;
ARTG -9.91%&lt;br /&gt;
BIDU -4.57%&lt;br /&gt;
DHX -2.42%&lt;br /&gt;
DIVX -0.96%&lt;br /&gt;
EBAY -1.74% (after shedding 13.88% today)&lt;br /&gt;
EGOV -3.13%&lt;br /&gt;
EQIX -1.12%&lt;br /&gt;
FLWS -0.96%&lt;br /&gt;
GIGM -1.56%&lt;br /&gt;
GOOG -7.63%&lt;br /&gt;
GSOL -1.86%&lt;br /&gt;
LQDT -3.23%&lt;br /&gt;
MELI -2.97%&lt;br /&gt;
NFLX --1.17%&lt;br /&gt;
OMTR -1.77%&lt;br /&gt;
PRFT -1.38%&lt;br /&gt;
SCOR -1.49%&lt;br /&gt;
SINA -0.98%&lt;br /&gt;
SDXC -1.18%&lt;br /&gt;
SFLY -1.38%&lt;br /&gt;
SKIL -0.92%&lt;br /&gt;
SOHU -2.73%&lt;br /&gt;
SVVS -1.02%&lt;br /&gt;
TMRK -1.54%&lt;br /&gt;
TSCM -1.54%&lt;br /&gt;
VOCS -1.23%&lt;br /&gt;
VPRT -1.13%&lt;br /&gt;
YHOO -1.07%&lt;br /&gt;
I suspect a significant downtick at open and continued pressure on internet stocks as quarterly reports will be pouring in from all ocrners of the internet. Consensus is that revenue will be fairly moderate if not worse than same quarter last year (GOOG, EBAY, MSFT already got hit). Suspect YHOO and AMZN to underperform as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:53:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3096 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>September or ....  October</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-3041</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;September or ....  October October October&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:51:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Marc L</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3041 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Went as low as 118.39 this</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-2923</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Went as low as 118.39 this morning, but is rebounding.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:24:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2923 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Eric, on the contrary. I</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-2876</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Eric, on the contrary. I agree with the 115 setting. With the state of economy, the trickle down effect will show on Internet stocks. 115 is the perfect threshold to make this prediction more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:50:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2876 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I know, but 120 simply</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-2874</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know, but 120 simply seemed way too easy of a target.  :S&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:39:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2874 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Eric, yep i have the alerts</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-2794</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Eric, yep i have the alerts set for dips below and rise above. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/intchart.asp?symb=QNET&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Try this for better chart on QNET&lt;/a&gt;. Since inception of index, it has NEVER hit 115! Today it closed at 127.71.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:56:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2794 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>QNET is such an odd index -</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comment-2656</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;QNET is such an odd index - there are hardly any decent charts for it anywhere.  Even Yahoo Finance can only pull up a 5 day rolling chart.  Be nice to have a chart for this prediction.  And the Yahoo stock badge can&#039;t pull up the QNET at all.  At least they have really good alert systems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:09:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2656 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Internet stocks tumble to yearly low</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Judgment on August 7, 2008:&lt;/b&gt;  The Internet Index appears to be weathering the current market ups and downs quite well (knock on wood).  This prediction did not occur in the allotted timeframe.  Judged at S$0.  -- The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NASDAQ Internet Index (&lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=^QNET&quot; title=&quot;NASDAQ Internet Stocks ticker symbol, QNET&quot;&gt;QNET&lt;/a&gt; for short) tracks 77 different stocks that make their living off the Internet.  Other than Yahoo!, Google, Amazon and eBay, no single stock makes up more than 5 percent of the index’s portfolio.  Microsoft is not a part of the index due to its gargantuan influence. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u98/yogiBearMarket.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Yogi Bear Market&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;329&quot; width=&quot;250&quot; /&gt;The 52-week high for QNET is 162.69, while the low has dragged to 118.27.  Today as of this writing, the index is +3.42 (2.70%) for the day at 130.02, according to Yahoo! Finance.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that by then end of trading on August 8, 2008, or earlier, the Internet index will bottom out at a yearly low of 115.00 or below during intraday trading.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In order for this prediction to be judged favorably, this low must be &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=^QNET&quot;&gt;reported by Yahoo! Finance&lt;/a&gt;.  The value does not need to be a closing price; intraday values at or below 115.00 will be considered the basis for a favorable judgment on or before August 8, 2008.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bets will close on August 7, 2008, unless this prediction is closed sooner due to market events. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Yogi &amp;quot;Bear&amp;quot; photo credit: Flickr / &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/carbonated/&quot;&gt;carbonated&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/internet-stocks-tumble-yearly-low#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/6294">internet stocks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/6231">nasdaq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/6295">QNET</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:34:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109307 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
