<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - RIM shares hit $180 - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;RIM shares hit $180&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>RIMM ended 2008 at $40.58.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-8934</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;RIMM ended 2008 at $40.58. Unfavorable judgment can now be rendered.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 05:28:17 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8934 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Correction ... it is down</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-6495</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Correction ... it is down over 11% today to $62/sh now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:48:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6495 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Poor RIIMM. The market just</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-6480</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Poor RIIMM. The market just not doing it any favors. Down nearly 7% again to about $66/sh. Unless it is has highly successful anti-cancer vaccine that is about to be approved by FDA, a miracle cannot help RIMM reach $180. This is a guaranteed bet with a 3 months ROI (shorter if RIMM gets delisted or folds).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 08:26:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6480 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I think RIM will need an</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-6375</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think RIM will need an utter miracle for this stock to meet the requirements of this prediction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:28:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6375 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for catching that,</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-6374</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for catching that, David.  Fixed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:27:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6374 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@TIS, why is the betting</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-6373</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@TIS, why is the betting closed on 12/1 if judgment date is 12/31? That is a long time for bets to be frozen.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:25:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6373 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RIMM plunged down today to</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-6372</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE48P4MU20080926&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RIMM plunged down today to about $72/sh today following a weak forecast.&lt;/a&gt; There is absolutely NO WAY for RIMM to break $180 by judgment date.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:18:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6372 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RIMM continues the slide.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-5766</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;RIMM continues the slide. Down to below $100 today. Seriously doubt it can gain 80% in under 3 months as more &quot;iPhone killers&quot; debuts for the holiday shopping season.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:35:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5766 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@David: Thanks!  I&#039;m new</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-4917</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@David: Thanks!  I&#039;m new here.  Your interpretation was how I took the site&#039;s own Prediction -- about three minutes before I bet S$5,000 precious newbie bucks Against -- so I am indeed happy to enjoy the benefit of a strike price 4% lower.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Still, it is perhaps my duty to point out that analyst Peter Misek (who is surely a smarter fellow than I am) expressed his cited target price in Cdn$.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; It&#039;s bad enough to let others bet against *me*.  While I willingly accept play money from *all*, I&#039;d not want any *one* individual to feel that I did so other than as part of a &quot;perfect information&quot; game.  ;-)  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; On a related note, I interpreted &quot;fiscal year&quot; to be a misstatement of &quot;calendar year,&quot; as what matters here is merely a High market price quotation, rather than a matter of closing the accounting books or reporting on them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:57:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Stevens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4917 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@David, the spirit in which</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-4898</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@David, the spirit in which this prediciton was written is based on US dollar on the Nasdaq (in case anyone else is wondering).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 06:28:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4898 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;we were even pondering</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comment-4894</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&quot;we were even pondering putting forth a prediction that the stock would fall to as low as $125 on the Nasdaq&quot;:  At least that would have unambiguously *implied* US dollars, the kind favored by NASDAQ. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; The current proposition, as written, is ambiguous: After all, RIM is a Canadian company, and its home is the Toronto Stock Exchange .. which prefers to do business in Canadian dollars.  The difference is currently on the order of five percent in favor of US dollar.  (US$180 was about Cdn$187.85 last week).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:10:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Stevens</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4894 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RIM shares hit $180</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Judgment on January 5, 2008:&lt;/b&gt;  This did not occur by the end of 2008, by a long shot, which the community correctly predicted.  -- The Industry Standard &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original prediction:&lt;/b&gt; Well, we saw RIM stock &lt;a href=&quot;/fell%20more%20than%2012%&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;fell more than 12% this week&lt;/a&gt; on a disappointing profit outlook for BlackBerries. It wasn’t exactly a surprise – check out &lt;a href=&quot;/this%20quote&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this quote&lt;/a&gt; from a WSJ article before the earnings announcement: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; “With shares of Research in Motion up 150% over the past year, investors are saying there is almost nothing that can trip up the fast-growing BlackBerry maker. The problem with that: RIM&#039;s business is getting riskier every quarter.”  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s funny, we were even pondering putting forth a prediction that the stock would fall to as low as $125 on the Nasdaq and we would have been close – it got as far as $125.33. It’s also amazing what a penny short will do to a company these days!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nonetheless, CEO Jim Balsillie was clearly feeling bullish on the earnings call, as are some industry analysts, in particular with the coming arrival of the Blackberry Bold, and Google’s recent Android delay announcements.  Canaccord Adams analyst Peter Misek has set a target of $225, positing that Q2 investments will ultimately pay off in the long term. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that shares of RIM will reach at least $180 at some point before the end of the fiscal year. That is, the high between now and December 31, 2008 must have been at least $180. We’ll close betting on December 1. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rim-shares-hit-180#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4699">co:RIM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/3969">earnings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/2570">stock price</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:01:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108810 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
