<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I don&#039;t think anything else</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8032</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I don&#039;t think anything else is coming on this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:43:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8032 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A little more...&quot;To Yahoo&#039;s</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7684</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;A little more...&quot;To Yahoo&#039;s dismay, Google backed off to avoid a challenge from the U.S. Justice Department, &lt;b&gt;which said it would sue&lt;/b&gt; to block the Yahoo deal to preserve competition in Internet advertising.&quot;  Could be viewed as a &quot;failed to meet regulatory muster&quot;.  Definitely leaning more towards a 100% judgment.  Unfortunate gray area.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:17:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7684 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That is why I asked early on</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7678</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;That is why I asked early on how this prediction is to be handled if deal is abandoned. No response was received to address that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:21:39 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7678 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>While the deal wasn&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7677</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;While the deal wasn&#039;t &quot;thrown out&quot;, it&#039;s certainly not going to pass regulatory muster (&quot;This prediction will be judged after Yahoo and Google officially receive the blessing of the U.S. federal government.&quot;) - which I assume would be the requirement for success. Also, I think we can assume Google feels any acceptable deal to them would in fact be &quot;thrown out&quot; or else they wouldn&#039;t have walked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&#039;d say it&#039;s definitely not a 0%, it&#039;s arguably a 100%, and it&#039;s certainly a gray area.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:47:01 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7677 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is kind of a tricky</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7673</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is kind of a tricky one, guys.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you read today&#039;s reports, they say, &quot;The U.S. Department of Justice was &lt;b&gt;planning to block&lt;/b&gt; Google&#039;s proposed advertising deal with Yahoo, leading to Google&#039;s announcement Wednesday that it was backing out, according to Yahoo.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my mind, that would render a favorable judgment towards, &quot;Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster?&quot;  However, I could see an argument made that due to the way Bradley stated, &quot;This is a prediction that the partnership deal will be thrown out by the DoJ and/or FTC,&quot; - which didn&#039;t specifically happen - some could ask for a 0% judgment.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m leaning towards favorable judgment due to the news reports today, but am curious about your opinions. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:06:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7673 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Well.. this one can now be</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7668</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Well.. this one can now be judged. Google has just announced decision to abandon the deal with Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:30:11 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7668 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looks like those with active</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7615</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Looks like those with active bet on this one will have to wait a tad longer as Yahoo/Google revise deal plan and resubmit to DOJ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A26OW20081103?feedType=RSS&amp;amp;feedName=technologyNews&amp;amp;rpc=22&amp;amp;sp=true&quot; title=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A26OW20081103?feedType=RSS&amp;amp;feedName=technologyNews&amp;amp;rpc=22&amp;amp;sp=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A26OW20081103?feed...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7615 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Indeed, as the WSJ reports,</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7543</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Indeed, as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122540817013886075.html?mod=djemalertTECH&quot;&gt;WSJ reports&lt;/a&gt;, this could be judged/determined next week.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:00:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7543 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.washingtonpost.com</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7536</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR2008103100009.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR2008103100009.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR200810...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:14:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7536 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is seeming less and</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7455</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is seeming &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/10/key-congressman.html&quot;&gt;less and less likely&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:28:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7455 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looks like Yahoo and Google</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7033</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Looks like Yahoo and Google are planning for concessions with DOJ to gain approval.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:30:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7033 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The deal was delayed on</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-6718</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;The deal was delayed on Thursday.  Not thrown out, but delayed.  It is unclear when a judgment might occur.  It does seem to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/10/03/google-yahoo-delay-ad-deal-over-doj-investigation&quot;&gt;cast some doubt&lt;/a&gt; on a favorable outcome, however.  Only time will tell.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 08:34:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6718 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European Commission has been</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-5759</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080915-european-commission-google-yahoo-ad-deal-needs-closer-look.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;European Commission has been review Google-Yahoo ad deal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:33:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5759 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Bradley and TIS, did not</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-5636</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Bradley and TIS, did not get an answer from last time so I am asking again. How will this be judged if either Google/Yahoo abandons the deal? According to the Google/Yahoo deal (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1011006/000089161808000399/f42710exv10w19.htm&quot; title=&quot;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1011006/000089161808000399/f42710exv10w19.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1011006/000089161808000399/f42710...&lt;/a&gt;), it states that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
16.2.1 The Parties will implement the Services under this Agreement 105 days after the Effective Date (or as extended upon agreement of the parties), or sooner if a Governmental Authority provides notice that any regulatory issues, objections or concerns have been resolved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The 105 days points to a September 25 date. DOJ decision may not happen by then. However, there is stipulation for both parties to extend the date as needed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, October 11 is the date by which Google and/or Yahoo can decide to abandon the deal to avoid lawsuit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 16.2.4 Either Party may terminate the Agreement (a) 120 days after the Effective Date in order to avoid or end a lawsuit or similar action filed on competition-law grounds if (i) such party has taken all actions in compliance with this Section 16.2 including offering to make commercially reasonable amendments to this Agreement, and (ii) defending such action is not commercially reasonable with respect to that Party (taking all factors into account, including without limitation effects on a party’s brand or business outside the scope of the Agreement); or (b) if a court of competent jurisdiction has entered an order enjoining the implementation of the Agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Articles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2008/09/jerry-yangs-next-date-with-destiny-approaching-fast/&quot; title=&quot;http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2008/09/jerry-yangs-next-date-with-destiny-approaching-fast/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2008/09/jerry-yangs-next-date-with-destiny-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://precursorblog.com/content/countdown-14-days-until-google-yahoo-doj-deadline&quot; title=&quot;http://precursorblog.com/content/countdown-14-days-until-google-yahoo-doj-deadline&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://precursorblog.com/content/countdown-14-days-until-google-yahoo-do...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:45:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5636 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Google/Yahoo ad deal may</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-5484</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;The Google/Yahoo ad deal may be in jeopardy.. DOJ hired big guns attorney for potential antitrust lawsuits on Google. This news had quite a bit of coverage (samples below):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080909-doj-girds-loins-for-possible-challenge-to-yahoo-google-deal.html&quot; title=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080909-doj-girds-loins-for-possible-challenge-to-yahoo-google-deal.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080909-doj-girds-loins-for-possib...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/money-out/litvack-letter-tips-off-dojs-g.php&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/money-out/litvack-letter-tips-off-dojs-g.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/money-out/litvack...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://rss.macworld.com/click.phdo?i=a927c7b8749d53e6b4bfb07433a0bee4&quot; title=&quot;http://rss.macworld.com/click.phdo?i=a927c7b8749d53e6b4bfb07433a0bee4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://rss.macworld.com/click.phdo?i=a927c7b8749d53e6b4bfb07433a0bee4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2008/09/portfolio_0909&quot; title=&quot;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2008/09/portfolio_0909&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2008/09/portfolio_0909&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-doj-hires-top-litigator-for-possible-antitrust-challenge-to-google-yaho/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-doj-hires-top-litigator-for-possible-antitrust-challenge-to-google-yaho/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-doj-hires-top-litigator-for-possibl...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://valleywag.com/5047080/doj-hires-gun-to-bust-up-google-and-yahoo-ad-trust&quot; title=&quot;http://valleywag.com/5047080/doj-hires-gun-to-bust-up-google-and-yahoo-ad-trust&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://valleywag.com/5047080/doj-hires-gun-to-bust-up-google-and-yahoo-a...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/09/is-doj-ready-to.html&quot; title=&quot;http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/09/is-doj-ready-to.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/09/is-doj-ready...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetnews.com/government/article.php/3770376/DoJ+Intensifies+GoogleYahoo+Scrutiny.htm&quot; title=&quot;http://www.internetnews.com/government/article.php/3770376/DoJ+Intensifies+GoogleYahoo+Scrutiny.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.internetnews.com/government/article.php/3770376/DoJ+Intensifi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://abajournal.com/news/doj_hires_well_known_litigator_in_google_antitrust_ad_probe&quot; title=&quot;http://abajournal.com/news/doj_hires_well_known_litigator_in_google_antitrust_ad_probe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://abajournal.com/news/doj_hires_well_known_litigator_in_google_anti...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cio.com/article/448427/Report_DOJ_Hires_Antitrust_Expert_in_Google_Yahoo_Probe&quot; title=&quot;http://www.cio.com/article/448427/Report_DOJ_Hires_Antitrust_Expert_in_Google_Yahoo_Probe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cio.com/article/448427/Report_DOJ_Hires_Antitrust_Expert_in_G...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:46:41 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5484 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster?</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Various groups, including most notably Microsoft, are likely to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;taxonomyName=internet_business&amp;amp;articleId=9097998&amp;amp;taxonomyId=71&amp;amp;intsrc=kc_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;express concerns&lt;/a&gt; to the Department of Justice about the &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/12/google-yahoo-strike-ad-deal-0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently-announced&lt;/a&gt; advertising partnership between Yahoo! and Google.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those companies have publicly stated that they don&#039;t believe regulatory approval is necessary, but that in a show of good faith they intend to seek it prior to the commencement of activities under the deal.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that the partnership deal will be thrown out by the DoJ and/or FTC.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There has been some recent movement in this story &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/19/house-leaders-plan-hearing-google-yahoo-deal&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  This prediction will be judged after Yahoo and Google officially receive the blessing of the U.S. federal government. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/787">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1531">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/790">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/750">Yahoo!</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:17:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108631 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
