<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - RIM&amp;#039;s 3G BlackBerry for AT&amp;amp;T delayed - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;RIM&#039;s 3G BlackBerry for AT&amp;T delayed&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I am curious how that got</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1799</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I am curious how that got decided. The BB and the iPhone should both be good sellers and some competition would have been ok for the public.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am wondering what the impact will be where the iPhone gets shipped and then a lrge amount of BB comes on line. What will the performance impact be on the iPhone users?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:08:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Douglas W. Goodall</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1799 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ATT will likely NOT launch</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1492</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;ATT will likely NOT launch their two hot 3G phones in the same month.&lt;br /&gt;
If 3G iPhone launches in June, BB-Bold gets pushed out - likely to late July or August.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:37:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MANUEL CANTORIA</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1492 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>k, thanks.</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1104</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;k, thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:50:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1104 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If they actually ship</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1091</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;If they actually ship (launch) the 3G product in May, then I would assume we&#039;d be closing this at 0%, and closing it a good month early.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:17:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1091 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sounds good to me.  Just</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1089</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Sounds good to me.  Just wanted it clearer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So &quot;launch&quot; means ship.  If they start shipping in the next 3 weeks (ie still in May) do we close at 0% or 100%?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:35:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1089 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shipping the product</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1088</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Shipping the product constitutes the launch of that product.  As for the Bold, which you link to, &quot;RIM said that it expects the Bold to be shipping worldwide this summer.&quot;  The 3G Blackberry was supposed to be launched in June.  This is a prediction that it will not.  And, to your point, the Bold is now scheduled for &quot;the summer,&quot; which would seem to indicate that August could be a viable time frame.  I&#039;m not surprised to see this prediction tank.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further, announcing a product does not imply a launch.  How, then, could one have a delayed launch?  If company X announced the upcoming launch of product Y on Z date, and they missed Z date, that would be a delayed launch.  Agree?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1088 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.thestandard.com/ne</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comment-1087</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/05/12/rims-blackberry-bold-beats-apple-3g-punch&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/05/12/rims-blackberry-bold-beats-apple-3g-punch&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/05/12/rims-blackberry-bold-beats-ap...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can we get some definitions?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What constitutes a &quot;launch&quot;?  Actually shipping product, or an unveiling such as todays?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the launch comes in May, does this prediction close at 0% (certainly not a delay) or 100% (didn&#039;t launch in June 2008)?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:56:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1087 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>RIM&#039;s 3G BlackBerry for AT&amp;T delayed</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Judgment on July 1, 2008:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;As the community correctly predicted, the 3G Blackberry was not available for purchase on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phones/pda-phones-smartphones.jsp&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T Wireless online store&lt;/a&gt; by the end of June, 2008.  Judged at S$100.  -- The Industry Standard &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original Prediction: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href=&quot;http://techland.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/04/24/delay-seen-for-rims-new-blackberry/&quot; title=&quot;3G Blackberry delay&quot;&gt;reported by Fortune&lt;/a&gt;, the &amp;quot;iPhone killer&amp;quot; 3G Blackberry could have a delayed launch from June to August.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Research in Motion (&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=RIMM&quot; rel=&quot;external&quot;&gt;RIMM&lt;/a&gt;) is facing a delay with the introduction of its new hotly anticipated 3G BlackBerry phone for AT&amp;amp;T (&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/quote/quote.html?symb=ATT&quot; rel=&quot;external&quot;&gt;ATT&lt;/a&gt; ).  The release of the phone, apparently named Meteor, has been pushed to as late as August, from the planned June launch, say people close to the companies.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/rim_s_iphone_killer_may_in_fact_be_delayed&quot;&gt;As noted&lt;/a&gt; by Henry Blodget over at Silicon Alley Insider, &amp;quot;Fortune said the delay has been attributed to call quality, but speculates that this is just a cover story: AT&amp;amp;T doesn&#039;t want to hurt the launch of the 3G iPhone.&amp;quot; (See &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/3g-iphone-arrives-within-60-days&quot;&gt;related Prediction&lt;/a&gt;.) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that the 3G Blackberry will not launch in June, 2008.  Bets will be halted on June 24, unless the phone is released earlier.  Judgment will be made on July 1st, 2008. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/rims-3g-blackberry-t-delayed-until-august#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/3580">ATT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/786">mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/4606">RIMM</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:36:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105446 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
