<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.theindustrystandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Yahoo to accept Microsoft acquisition by mid-March - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Yahoo to accept Microsoft acquisition by mid-March&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&quot;var msg = &quot;Are you sure you</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-1316</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&quot;var msg = &quot;Are you sure you want to Log Off?&quot; Pretty sure, the answer is no&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:57:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Janice I Clark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1316 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sorry for a dumb question,</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-1315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Sorry for a dumb question, but I really can&#039;t get, what CAUBE is?...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:57:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Regina A Castillo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1315 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Google Stock price&#039;   at</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-514</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&quot;Google Stock price&#039;   at  google.com.  Survery says&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yahoo finance, first search result.  Google could not find its own stock price.   .  Yahoo fianace is yahoo&#039;s greatest asset as even google uses them....  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=google+stock+price&quot; title=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=google+stock+price&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=google+stock+price&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GOOG: Summary for GOOGLE - Yahoo! FinanceGet detailed information on GOOGLE (GOOG) including quote performance, Real-Time ECN, technical chart ... TheStreet.com Power Stock Rankings: March 4 ...&lt;br /&gt;
finance.yahoo.com/q?s=Goog - 45k - Cached - Similar pages&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:18:08 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>rob shambro</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 514 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If this goes into a proxy</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-451</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;If this goes into a proxy fight, it sounds like this could go way beyond the March 15 deadline for this prediction to come true.  Andrew 9 is right, this could drag on for some time if Yahoo resists.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/microsoft-to-authorize-proxy-fight-at-yahoo/&quot; title=&quot;http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/microsoft-to-authorize-proxy-fight-at-yahoo/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/microsoft-to-authorize-prox...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:21:18 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 451 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo! board is melting</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-441</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yahoo! board is melting under pressure according to new reports. This is probably a good thing for Microsoft as they turn up the heat in an attempt to get a deal done. Unless more serious offers start to come watch for Yang to get ousted and the board to capitulate to Microsoft demands. I don&#039;t think mid-March is realistic but sometime in May is certainly possible.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:46:14 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew 9</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 441 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I tend to agree with you</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-415</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I tend to agree with you Francis.  Although, the speculation that went out today that News Corp may be interested in throwing in a bid is a very interesting concept.  Seems very speculative, but interesting nonetheless.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:54:56 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 415 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-411</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;So, the headline had changed. Firstly, we heard that &quot;Yahoo to reject Mircosoft&#039;s buyout offer&quot; . And today the talk among some of the analyst is &quot;Yahoo think that Microsoft &#039;s offer under value the internet company&quot;. Well, that mean the &quot;talk&quot; of Microsoft acquisition of Yahoo is still very much alive. Its now about how much Yahoo want to sell and how much Mircosoft want to pay !&lt;br /&gt;
I am convinced that this is a deal that will happen .....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:52:52 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Francis Tay</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 411 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Elayne, it means Yahoo will</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-398</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Elayne, it means Yahoo will accept an offer to merge (i.e. acquisition bid) by Microsoft within the given time frame.  There could be three before this is settled, for instance.  With Yahoo formally declining the initial bid, they can&#039;t &quot;change their mind.&quot;  They can, however, try to get even more money and accept a higher bid, or large investment, as pointed out by Andrew above.  The initial bid prediction was closed before the news came out about the Yahoo&#039;s rejection, as it had a very aggressive closing date.  This prediction is broader than that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:58:50 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 398 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So what is the actual</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-397</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;So what is the actual defining factor, if you are judging this based on &quot;serious investment from Microsoft bid&quot;?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since they&#039;ve rejected the original bid, does this mean Microsoft has to make another bid, which Yahoo then accepts?  Or does this mean that Yahoo will change their mind, and accept the bid after all by mid-March?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t really feel comfortable making a prediction bet on this until it has been clarified as to how this is going to be judged.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elayne Victor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 397 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Agreed, Andrew.  The</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Agreed, Andrew.  The headline specifically states that Yahoo will accept Microsoft&#039;s acquisition.  Accepting &quot;some sort of serious investment from Microsoft&quot; is not the same as accepting an acquisition bid. Yahoo has quite specifically rejected Microsoft&#039;s acquisition bid.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A number of articles have even been posted here to The Standard stating that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/yahoo-says-microsoft-offer-undervalues-company&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/yahoo-says-microsoft-offer-undervalues-company&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/yahoo-says-microsoft-offer-un...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/whats-behind-yahoos-rejection-microsoft-bid&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/whats-behind-yahoos-rejection-microsoft-bid&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/whats-behind-yahoos-rejection...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/update-yahoo-says-microsoft-offer-undervalues-company&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/update-yahoo-says-microsoft-offer-undervalues-company&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/11/update-yahoo-says-microsoft-o...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/09/wsj-yahoo-reject-microsoft-offer&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/09/wsj-yahoo-reject-microsoft-offer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/09/wsj-yahoo-reject-microsoft-of...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original intention of this Prediction was not whether Yahoo would accept some sort of investment from Microsoft.  It was that Yahoo would accept Microsoft&#039;s acquisition bid.  The judgement should follow the spirit of the prediction (and the letter of the prediction&#039;s title), not try to get out on a technicality that &quot;investment&quot; was mentioned in the body.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:23:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kevin Railsback173773</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 396 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The headline should be</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-395</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;The headline should be changed to &quot;investment&quot; instead of &quot;acquisition&quot;. Those are two very different scenarios. I bet against either way, yahoo! is profitable and doesn&#039;t &quot;need&quot; the $$. From a search perspective they have the larger share of audience than MSN so it&#039;s unlikely they will see a big value in being owned by smaller share msn (if search is what msn is after).  The combination of the two does not make any sense since they have very different cultures and combined are still not enough to topple google. If yahoo! could get their house in order I think they could mount an attack themselves through smart acquisitions, however, their track record is poor. Just ask Mark Cuban who got a shiny new NBA team with yahoo! money for video assets Yahoo! divested of (possibly too early now with video taking off).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:10:23 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrew 9</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 395 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That isn&#039;t definitive, if</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-394</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;That isn&#039;t definitive, if you read the prediction closely.  It says, &quot;The prediction is that Yahoo will accept some sort of serious investment from Microsoft bid by mid-March.&quot;  It does not state that Yahoo will reject the initial bid by Microsoft.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:45:04 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 394 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This should be closed and</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comment-392</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;This should be closed and judged.  It has been widely reported that Yahoo is rejecting MS&#039; offer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/02/11/Yahoo-says-Microsoft-offer-undervalues-company_1.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/02/11/Yahoo-says-Microsoft-offer-undervalues-company_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/02/11/Yahoo-says-Microsoft-offer-und...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:11:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kevin Railsback173773</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 392 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo to accept Microsoft acquisition by mid-March</title>
 <link>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;background-color: #dddddd; font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;UPDATE:  The Yahoo/MS story is still unresolved to this day.  However, in terms of the prediction not occurring, the community was correct.   --The Industry Standard&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;   &lt;p&gt;We recently &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-acquisition&quot;&gt;closed an aggressive prediction&lt;/a&gt; which predicted Yahoo! would accept the &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/02/01/microsofts-offer-yahoos-board&quot;&gt;Microsoft bid&lt;/a&gt; by Feb 6th.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Industry Standard community felt that the time-frame was too short, and correctly bet against that prediction by 46%.  Any prediction that closes under 50% suggests that the community believes a  particular prediction/event will &lt;i&gt;not &lt;/i&gt;occur.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We are recreating this prediction now with a closing date further into the future, to give this more time to be vetted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The original deal, it seems, has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/02/a-much-better-microsoft-yahoo-deal.html&quot;&gt;caused a serious wave&lt;/a&gt; of activity.  Microsoft shareholders are upset, Yahoo employees appear to be upset, Google seems upset.  Something is going to happen fairly soon, that much is certain. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The prediction is that Yahoo will accept some sort of acquisition bid from Microsoft  bid by mid-March.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.theindustrystandard.com/predictions/yahoo-accept-microsoft-investment-mid-march#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/898">acquisitions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/790">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.theindustrystandard.com/taxonomy/term/1034">Yahoo</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:11:16 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">100647 at http://www.theindustrystandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
